Not a day goes by during the college football season that I don’t
thank God the National Collegiate Athletic Association came to their senses and
created a playoff system of some sort. It still isn’t perfect, but it sure is
far superior to the way the college football national champions were crowned
back in the 1980s.
Not an exact science
For whatever reason, the NCAA had no desire to have a playoff system
in football, unlike virtually every other sport which did.
That left pollsters, mostly coaches and reporters, to vote for the
national champion. There were two main polls that were used to determine the
champion: The Coaches’ Poll and the Associated Press.
They used criteria that makes sense, but is still an inexact science.
Usually, if a team went undefeated, they were automatically declared national
champions. However, if teams suffered one loss, or even two or three, and there
were no undefeated teams, these selectors would look at other variables. Did
the top teams play each other or common opponents? Did one have a stronger schedule, that is
play tougher teams? Even the most bizarre of factors – a loss early in the
season matters less than a loss late on the season. Another factor was point
differential, encouraging strong teams to run up the score on weak teams to
“make a statement”. The surest way to win the national championship, if you
were not ranked number one, was to defeat the number one team.
All told, the national champion was not chosen in an objective manner.
It was all a matter of opinion.
This would lead to a lot of controversy.
We are the champions
The first two champions of the decade were straightforward. In 1980,
the Georgia Bulldogs went 12-0, including a 17-10 win over Notre Dame in the
Sugar Bowl to win the championship. The next year, Clemson went 11-0 and
defeated Nebraska 22-15 in the Orange Bowl to win the championship.
The next few years, it was the challenger who beat the number one ranked
team for the championship. In 1982, Penn State was ranked second and defeated
the top-ranked Georgia Bulldogs 27-23 in the Sugar Bowl to secure the national
championship. The next year the number five Miami Hurricanes beat the number
one Nebraska Cornhuskers 31-30 to be crowned national champions. In this case,
Auburn was 11-1 and was ranked third going into bowl games. They defeated
Michigan 9-7 in the Sugar Bowl while the two teams ahead of them, Nebraska and Texas,
had both lost. Further, Auburn had defeated Florida who gave Miami their only
loss of the season. Yet, the Coaches’ Poll and Associated Press gave Miami the
championship – primarily because they had the opportunity to beat number one and seized it.
The next year was even more controversial because Brigham Young
University was the only undefeated team in the nation and was voted the
champion. Yet, critics said the Cougars played a much weaker schedule than any
of the other contenders, and their final game was not a major bowl, but the
Holiday Bowl where they defeated Michigan who had a 6-6 record. Yet they were unbeaten.
Oklahoma won the 1985 championship, with an 11-1 record, by defeating
number-one ranked Penn State in The Orange Bowl. Michigan, with a loss and a tie, also made a strong
case for the championship.
The next year, things would take a step in the right direction.
“Championship” game
The climate of college bowls was much different in 1986. Back then it
meant something to qualify for a bowl game. Unlike today, where there are
dozens and dozens of games named after the sponsoring companies, back then
there was a handful of meaningful games, all played on New Year’s Day. It is
funny though, that even back then we made fun of the fact there were all these
other bowls, like the Holiday, Independence, Florida Citrus, Liberty, and Gator
Bowls. Even the Fiesta Bowl, which wormed its way into the spotlight, was considered
a bit of an outsider (but a bit more about that later).
The main bowl games of the time were the Cotton, Rose, Orange, and
Sugar Bowls. By 1988, the Fiesta Bowl had joined the party as well.
Back then, some of the teams for these games were determined by their
conference. The Big-8 Conference champion qualified for the Orange Bowl, while
the Pac-10 and Big-10 champions met every year in the Rose Bowl. The Fiesta
Bowl gained prominence because organizers had the ability to invite whatever
teams they wanted to. There was no national championship game at the time, as
the national champion was determined by those two polls.
After the 1986 season, Fiesta Bowl organizers saw their chance to
create a de facto national championship game. That’s because the number one
ranked Miami Hurricanes and number two ranked Penn State Nittany Lions were
both independent teams. Consequently, they were both invited to meet on January
2, 1987, a day after the usual bowl day showcase, in the Fiesta Bowl. Since
they were number one and two, the pollsters would literally have no choice but
to vote the winner the national champion – although if memory serves it was not
unanimous, as it obviously should have been.
Penn State would win that game, and be voted national champion.
There was finally a national championship game, but it was not to
last.
The remaining years
Number one met number two again after the 1987 season as Miami
defeated top-ranked Oklahoma for the title. The next year, Notre Dame went
unbeaten at 12-0 and won the national championship by beating number three West
Virginia in the Fiesta Bowl. Miami would round out the decade by winning its
third title. This was a little muddy too, because Miami and Notre Dame both had
a loss, but Miami beat Notre Dame. However, Notre Dame had a much tougher
schedule and Miami’s loss was to a lower ranked opponent.
It just showed, the national championship was a matter of opinion.
Parting thoughts
One of my biggest pet peeves was the lack of a college football
playoff. Voting was such a poor way to determine a champion. It penalized teams
that coaches and sports writers did not see, and completely discounted the
possibility a smaller school could compete with a bigger school. The fact this
is possible is evident in the college basketball tournament every year. Because
the teams have to play the games, no one can presuppose the winner.
In college football they did, all the time.
Eventually, starting in the 1990s, college football organizers slowly
began to come around. They started with the Bowl Coalition, followed by the Bowl Alliance and the Bowl
Championship Series. This last one, the BCS, showed how smaller schools such as
Utah State and Boise State could shock the bigger schools. Yet, all of those
systems still relied on opinion and voting in some way.
They still do, with the College Football Playoff, but at least they
have created a tournament so the best do play off. However, the best is still
determined by a committee, not by results on the field.
Hopefully, some day, as the teams continue to organize themselves into
conferences, the NCAA just organizes a tournament where the champions of these
conferences play each other until a champion is determined.
It works in every other sport, why not football.
No comments:
Post a Comment